> The author magnificently understates how useful closures can be.
I didn't see a reference to closures in the article.
I know you probably know this but first class functions aren't closures.
The wikipedia article for them doesn't even mention closures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-class_function
The author magnificently understates how useful closures can be.
Besides this, the author has posted a single complaint about the language (one that I don't find particularly important) and then seems to act as though the language is completely unusable.