News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by canjobear on Sunday November 23, 2025 @10:38PM (#46030107)
There's no problem reconciling the quantum with the Newtonian. Quantum mechanics recovers Newtonian mechanics in the appropriate limit. The problem is reconciling the quantum and the Einsteinian.
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by sosodev on Sunday November 23, 2025 @10:53PM (#46030194)
But there’s no quantum explanation of gravity, right?
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by lmpdev on Sunday November 23, 2025 @11:01PM (#46030248)
At this point we have several

They’re all largely untestable though

String theory, LQG, half a dozen others

Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by arthurcolle on Sunday November 23, 2025 @10:54PM (#46030197)
Classified
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by fnordpiglet on Monday November 24, 2025 @01:56AM (#46031124)
There’s no explanation of gravity, quantum or no. There are merely descriptions.
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by isolli on Monday November 24, 2025 @03:10AM (#46031553)
Isn't everything descriptions, in the end, aka models? Turtles all the way down...
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by B1FF_PSUVM on Monday November 24, 2025 @12:24PM (#46036531)
"Two masses attract each other with a force F = m1 m2 G/r^2"

"OK, but why don't they repel each other?"

"That would make life really hard, and we wouldn't be here discussing it ..."

Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by tsimionescu on Monday November 24, 2025 @02:40AM (#46031363)
Actually, Newtonian gravity can be added to QM and work perfectly well. It's GR gravity that doesn't work with QM, especially if you try to model very high curvature like you'd get near a black hole.
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by rhdunn on Monday November 24, 2025 @03:09AM (#46031550)
Quantum Electro-Dynamics (QED) is the application of Special Relativity (non-accelerating frames of reference, i.e. moving at a constant speed) to Electromagnetism. Thus, the issue is with applying accelerating frames of reference (the General in GR) to QM.
Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by moefh on Monday November 24, 2025 @10:31AM (#46035163)
> Special Relativity (non-accelerating frames of reference, i.e. moving at a constant speed)

Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine: special relativity works perfectly well in accelerating frames of reference, as long as the spacetime remains flat (a Minkowski space[1]), for example when any curvature caused by gravity is small enough that you can ignore it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space

Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by tsimionescu on Monday November 24, 2025 @10:46AM (#46035358)
None of these have anything to do with what I said. SR works just as well as classical mechanics with acceleration. If SR didn't work with acceleration, it would have never been accepted as a valid theory at all, it would have been a laughing stock, as acceleration was well understood since the times of Newton.

What general relativity does different from special relativity is that it extends the concept of relativity from inertial frames of reference to all frames of reference, even accelerating ones. In the process, it also explains the reason why inertial mass and gravitational mass happen to be the same, by tying the gravitational interaction fundamentally to the concept of acceleration.

Re:New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect a... by ithkuil on Monday November 24, 2025 @03:39PM (#46039019)
In particular with general relativity.

Quantum field theory (QFT) is quantum mechanics + special relativity