Why does TypeScript have be the answer to anything?

Re:Why does TypeScript have be the answer to anything? by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @12:27PM (#4602774)

> essentially the same strategy (i.e., some syntax changes and a pre-compiler)

TypeScript and CoffeeScript, yes. Dart's a brand new C-like web language that is quite different, and has its own VM. Although, of course, you can still compile to JS. But unlike TypeScript and CoffeeScript, it isn't really an alternative syntax for JS, or annotations removed at compile-time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why does TypeScript have be the answer to anything? by krohrbaugh on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @12:31PM (#4602789)

Yes, I know and you are correct.

At a high-level, though, and in the case where browsers are the target platform, those aspects are largely implementation details.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why does TypeScript have be the answer to anything? by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday October 02, 2012 @01:03PM (#4602994)

With the rather large exception of filesize.

[ Parent | on HN ]