News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Court filings allege Meta downplayed risks to children and misled the public. Parent comment

Re:Court filings allege Meta downplayed risks to children an... by Manuel_D on Sunday November 23, 2025 @02:39PM (#46026588)
So to be clear, anything other than a 4chan-like unmoderated chronological feed results in loss of section 230 protection?

Heck, even 4chan wouldn't qualify, because despite considerably looser content rules they still actually do perform moderation.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Court filings allege Meta downplayed risks to children an... by sokoloff on Sunday November 23, 2025 @08:09PM (#46029158)
Most sites that accept user-generated-content are forced to do some level of moderation, lest they become a cesspit of one form or another (CSAM, threats, hate speech, exposing porn to underage users, stolen credit card sales, etc...)
[ Parent | on HN ]