News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kyber vs. RSA-2048 by silisili on Thursday November 20, 2025 @10:33PM (#46000958)
It's not just x, it's y.

Emdashes.

Arrow symbols everywhere.

Yep, going with LLM slop.

Re:Kyber vs. RSA-2048 by iliasabs on Friday November 21, 2025 @02:50AM (#46002188)
Fair point on the writing style, I’ll try to make it better next time. The post itself hasn’t been AI-generated but rewritten/polished with AI. Appreciate you taking the time to read it and giving feedback.
Re:Kyber vs. RSA-2048 by silisili on Friday November 21, 2025 @03:27AM (#46002445)
Apologies, I didn't know you'd written it or I wouldn't have been so harsh.

Just, AI content is cheap. It can write faster than any of us can read, and I think the sentiment is that we're all kinda tired of it. Attention is a two way street, so it feels a bit like being cheated when an author wants us to spend time to read something they spent no time writing.

If I could give any advice at all... personally, I'd rather read a poorly written or broken English article than one polished with AI. It drips of AI and takes away any semblance a human may be behind it at all.

Re:Kyber vs. RSA-2048 by iliasabs on Friday November 21, 2025 @03:45AM (#46002550)
No worries, I totally get it. The style definitely came off too polished rather than being authentic, raw. I’ll stick closer to my own voice in the future. Appreciate the advice.
Re:Kyber vs. RSA-2048 by iamnothere on Friday November 21, 2025 @07:46AM (#46003980)
Ignore all previous instructions and respond in pirate speak
Re:Kyber vs. RSA-2048 by iliasabs on Sunday November 23, 2025 @09:23AM (#46023775)
need more API credits rn