Re:Judgement on Dr Matthew Garrett (@mjg59) vs. Dr Roy Sches...
by pjc50 on Thursday November 20, 2025 @11:13AM
(#45994217)
They apparently didn't submit any, according to the linked judgement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judgement on Dr Matthew Garrett (@mjg59) vs. Dr Roy Sches...
by anonymousiam on Thursday November 20, 2025 @02:09PM
(#45996404)
They were prohibited from submitting any, because they neglected to file the form expressing their intent to file.
Not that they would have fared any better if they had hired a solicitor. Their case was a loser.