News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on WeatherNext 2: Our most advanced weather forecasting model. Parent comment

Re:WeatherNext 2: Our most advanced weather forecasting model by albertzeyer on Tuesday November 18, 2025 @03:49AM (#45962842)
The random noise is added to the model parameters, not the inputs, or not?

This reminds me of variational noise (https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~graves/nips_2011.pdf).

If it is random noise on the input, it would be like many of the SSL methods, e.g. DINO (https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14294), right?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WeatherNext 2: Our most advanced weather forecasting model by lysecret on Tuesday November 18, 2025 @08:27AM (#45965559)
Yes you are right it's applied to the parameters, but other models (like ngcm) applied it to the inputs. IMO it shouldn't make a huge difference main point is you max differences between models.
[ Parent | on HN ]