Re:Lua vs Ruby benchmarks (similarly "high-level" languages,...
by silentbicycle on Saturday January 31, 2009 @09:38AM
(#459585)
While it would be an interesting project, the Ruby wouldn't necessarily be faster for it. I don't know Ruby well enough to say, but there are probably aspects in the language design itself that make it slower (as a trade-off for expressiveness). Lua is very fast, but that comes from aggressively simplifying the core of the language. Most things are ultimately built on only a few central constructs, and they have been very throughly optimized.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.