News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why do HN users still obscure their e-mail addres... by gojomo on Sunday September 30, 2012 @09:33PM (#4594902)
Supposedly the Gmail filter is the best. I still see it make an annoying number of errors.

I have my Gmail account as a secondary, occasionally used address, and looking at it right now, of the 23 messages it displays "above the fold" in my inbox, 7 are spam.

Currently I don't see any false-positives in the Gmail 'spam' folder, but in the past, I've even seen legitimate messages from Google's own lists there (!).

It's not that my spam filters elsewhere are any better. But, at least they don't cause me to lose forever false positives that I neglect to notice within 30 days. And, there is a definite correlation between how much spam you get and how many places your naked address appears. So if you ever review your spam folder for false positives, that process is easier if you've bee protective of your address (and thus get less spam).

Re:Ask HN: Why do HN users still obscure their e-mail addres... by prophetjohn on Sunday September 30, 2012 @09:39PM (#4594923)
Do you mark spam email that you get as spam? I rarely get spam in my GMail, but when I do I mark it as spam. Of course, maybe our habits are just different, but I like to reassure myself that I'm helping the system chug along.
Re:Ask HN: Why do HN users still obscure their e-mail addres... by gojomo on Sunday September 30, 2012 @10:03PM (#4594976)
I do, but only on the occasional times I check Gmail at all. It's possible it'd become better for me with more intense use/training, but I'm not ready to leap into even more dependency on Google services based on the experience so far.
Re:Ask HN: Why do HN users still obscure their e-mail addres... by prophetjohn on Sunday September 30, 2012 @10:09PM (#4594990)
Ah, well in that case it's probably partially explained by a lower volume of legitimate email that you get there if you don't really use it much.