Re:Dissecting Flock Safety: The Cameras Tracking You Are a S...
by queenkjuul on Sunday November 16, 2025 @08:27PM
(#45950093)
My neighborhood is very safe and we have no such cameras. What problem are you trying to solve and why do you think cameras are the only solution?
Re:Dissecting Flock Safety: The Cameras Tracking You Are a S...
by aerostable_slug on Monday November 17, 2025 @11:41AM
(#45955280)
> My neighborhood is very safe and we have no such cameras.
Good for you.
> why do you think cameras are the only solution?
Straw man.
I want to deter criminals from even thinking about targeting my neighborhood. The appearance of surveillance might serve as a powerful deterrent. Inclusion on a site that warns criminals where ALPR cameras are located would be a boon to this effort. Convincing decoy camera housings, the subject of my post, might be enough to get the neighborhood listed without actually having go forward with a full Flock installation.
Let me be extremely clear: there's no member of the set of humans that actively avoid ALPR cameras that I want coming to my home uninvited. Not a single one.
Re:Dissecting Flock Safety: The Cameras Tracking You Are a S...
by queenkjuul on Monday November 17, 2025 @09:30PM
(#45960750)
You think people will choose to target your neighborhood without the perceived threat of surveillance? Why?
I'm looking for convincing decoy ALPR cameras because I don't think my HOA will go for a real setup, and I've got concerns over the product's security. I want the appearance of surveillance if I can't get the real thing. Being on a Flock/ALPR tracking app/site would be a huge win.
There is no benefit to signaling one's virtue in this scenario. It's like having a sign in your yard that says "Proudly Gun-Free Household".