Re:Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive...
by A_Venom_Roll on Saturday November 15, 2025 @07:56AM
(#45937123)
Archive.is doesn't work on all sites to bypass the paywall. Media companies that are truly concerned about this should modify their paywall configuration.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive...
by Plasmoid2000ad on Saturday November 15, 2025 @08:38AM
(#45937388)
I've seen some theories or maybe more like guesses as to how the paywall bypass works - I don't think anyone (or at least no one posting places like here) seems to know.
One I saw suggested they've a set of subscriptions to the paywalled sites and some minimal custom work to hide the signed in account used - which seems plausible. That makes the defense most likely used to catch the account used and ban them - which would be a right pain.
Re:Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive...
by codedokode on Saturday November 15, 2025 @09:22AM
(#45937653)
They probably just set user agent (and reverse DNS name) to Google or some other company that can bypass the firewall.
Re:Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive...
by Worksheet on Saturday November 15, 2025 @10:01AM
(#45937875)
This seems the most likely way it works. Which makes me unsympathetic to publishers who complain about it. Digital distribution will always have this issue. Substack goes from strength to strength because they don't give an inch on the paywall.
Re:Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive...
by codedokode on Saturday November 15, 2025 @10:18AM
(#45937987)
Maybe they also use Google Cloud to look more convincing.
Re:Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive...
by nervysnail on Saturday November 15, 2025 @08:01PM
(#45941855)
For example, similar to mondediplo.com