Re:Fighting the New York Times' invasion of user privacy
by perplex3d on Thursday November 13, 2025 @10:43AM
(#45916221)
The “aspirational” language is what really stood out to me as well. “We’re building our privacy and security protections to match the responsibility” and “we are accelerating our security and privacy roadmap” and “our long term roadmap includes advanced security features designed to keep your data private, including client-side encryption” (what does this have to do with what OpenAI stores server-side?) and “we will build.” If OpenAI cared that much, then the privacy and security protections should be baked in rather than “tacked on.” Their statement makes me feel even less optimistic in their abilities to protect information.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.