News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:.NET 10 by electroly on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @10:20AM (#45901284)
Easy to avoid depending on the area; I'd urge you not to be discouraged by the presence of commercial libraries. They aren't as vital as it may seem from the outside. I've been a full-time C# developer since the first open beta and I have only one (1) instance where I used a commercial library. That was 2002 and if we were doing it today, we wouldn't have needed that commercial library. I have never used a commercial C# library other than that one time. We have a tremendous supply of open source libraries in NuGet, just like every other language, and much more functionality built into the standard library than most languages have. We just also have commercial UI libraries and such. That commercial library we used was a docking/tabbing UI library; you can get that from open source packages now (and my later projects do).
Re:.NET 10 by throwaway7356 on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @02:43PM (#45905286)
> I've been a full-time C# developer since the first open beta and I have only one (1) instance where I used a commercial library. That was 2002

So you used C# without any of the .Net runtime? I don't think Microsoft did open source in 2002...

Even Mono was only started in 2004.

Re:.NET 10 by toyg on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @03:21PM (#45905951)
Come on, it's clear he meant "commercial libraries not in the default Microsoft SDK".
Re:.NET 10 by stuartd on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @06:21PM (#45908322)