Re:Bluetooth 6.2 – more responsive, improves security, USB c...
by numpad0 on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @04:07AM
(#45897977)
Classic and LE are completely different protocols, from physical layer and up. It must be that it doesn't make a lot of sense for manufacturers to invest substantial effort in it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bluetooth 6.2 – more responsive, improves security, USB c...
by magicalhippo on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @06:12AM
(#45898759)
> Classic and LE are completely different protocols, from physical layer and up.
Which makes sense when you know it started life[1] as a separate protocol called Wibree by Nokia, which was specifically designed[2] to be usable by Bluetooth RF gear:
A major tenet of their design was that “it can be deployed with minor effort into devices already having Bluetooth, e.g. cellphones” with the added requirement that a “common RF section with Bluetooth must be possible”.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth_Low_Energy#History
[2]: https://www.ijert.org/research/wireless-communication-with-w...