News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Understanding traffic by yesfitz on Friday November 07, 2025 @04:52PM (#45851587)
The same can be said of any tax meant to curb a behavior (sin tax).

What traffic-reducing policy would you suggest such that all people are affected equally?

Re:Understanding traffic by bdangubic on Friday November 07, 2025 @06:00PM (#45852288)
absolutely none, which is why ideas like this will never see the light of day…
Re:Understanding traffic by thekyle on Friday November 07, 2025 @06:03PM (#45852310)
I think it's worth pointing out that congestion pricing is a policy that already exists in several cities around the world including New York City.
Re:Understanding traffic by tshaddox on Friday November 07, 2025 @07:01PM (#45852763)
And also in essentially any relevant private market for goods and services where capacity is limited, especially when there are more and less desirable times.
Re:Understanding traffic by Straw on Friday November 07, 2025 @06:28PM (#45852542)
In a very weak form, yes- and yet it still seems helpful and even popular after people saw the effects of implementation.
Re:Understanding traffic by dr2chase on Monday November 10, 2025 @02:27PM (#45879776)
Depends how you define "equal". One approach is simply to scale the charge by income -- effectively, convert time to money, and charge you a congestion tax of some amount of money-earning time. "6 minutes" is 1/10000 of your annual income -- $2 for someone earning $20,000 per year, $20 for someone earning $200,000 per year.

But does a vehicle with several people in it pay for the max, min, median, average, or the driver's time? I suspect "driver" is easiest, it seems like it might work but I'll bet there are some screwy ways to game that rule, too.