"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes before they're announced"

Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor... by wat10000 on Thursday November 06, 2025 @10:31PM (#45843300)

Then why didn’t you say cocaine? The connection of these boats to any drugs is dubious, but you picked a drug that they’re definitely not involved in even if you 100% believe the administration.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor... by lazyeye on Thursday November 06, 2025 @10:54PM (#45843418)

"The connection of these boats to any drugs is dubious..." this is simply ridiculous.

Boats with 3-4 outboards on the back carrying large bails of some unknown "cargo" transiting well-established drug routes is obviously not a "dubious" connection. We also don't know what the intelligence was on the ground which I'm also guessing was quite substantial.

Neither you or I have the faintest clue what information was available behind the targeting decisions. Reality and your desire to frame things to justify your hatred of Trump are two completely different things.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor... by wat10000 on Thursday November 06, 2025 @11:19PM (#45843521)

What’s ridiculous is believing anything these shysters say.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor... by lazyeye on Thursday November 06, 2025 @11:33PM (#45843579)

(shrugs) fine believe what you want...

[ Parent | on HN ]