News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Reinforce Impostor Syndrome by esrauch on Friday September 28, 2012 @12:15AM (#4584281)
Can you clarify this, are you claiming that reverse discrimination for women in CS doesn't exist? I wasn't aware that there was any question about that; I understand it to be publicly stated policy at all big tech companies. Note that I'm not making a claim that women are more likely to be hired or promoted; as I said there is a lot of discrimination against women that is less visible which is exactly what reverse discrimination is trying to, well, reverse.
Re:How to Reinforce Impostor Syndrome by Smudge on Friday September 28, 2012 @01:31PM (#4586728)
I wasn't claiming anything, in terms of whether it does or does not exist.

I was just pointing out that the two anecdotes you presented are merely that. Anecdotes. I see a lot of people on HN making statements like "that claim makes sense to me because [anecdote]," without regard for how representative the sample size is. This is called cherry-picking and is a great way to (unintentionally) reinforce a flawed world view.

It might be true that reverse discrimination in CS is commonly practiced, but your initial statement did nothing in the way of proving or disproving it.

Re:How to Reinforce Impostor Syndrome by esrauch on Saturday September 29, 2012 @03:28PM (#4590580)
I'm aware of what "anecdotally" means, that is exactly why I qualified my statement with the word "anecdotally".