Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor...
by elzbardico on Thursday November 06, 2025 @05:05PM
(#45841053)
No, the burden of proof is on the proponents of this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor...
by Rover222 on Friday November 07, 2025 @02:15PM
(#45849881)
same thing for a "genocide" in Palestine
Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor...
by queenkjuul on Friday November 07, 2025 @09:39PM
(#45853624)
Good thing we have plenty
Re:"I may have found a way to spot U.S. at-sea strikes befor...
by soiltype on Thursday November 20, 2025 @01:31PM
(#45995964)
That's a lazy and irrelevant response because, as I actually said, evidence has been provided. If it's bad evidence, say that, instead of making a new claim that someone else is an idiot, for which the burden of proof is on you.
Further, these comments tend to come with the claim that the whole thing is a CIA/FBI hoax. Guess who bears the burden of proof for that? (Don't bother guessing. It's the person making the claim.)