Re:I only got that job because I’m a girl
by glaak on Thursday September 27, 2012 @08:30PM
(#4583703)
As I recall being told by one of my professors as an MBA student, attractive people -- both men and women -- are generally assumed to be more competent. This effect is stronger for women than men. However, attractive women in "masculine" fields, like engineering, technology, or construction, are generally seen as being less competent.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I only got that job because I’m a girl
by moistgorilla on Thursday September 27, 2012 @08:45PM
(#4583749)
If you already objectively know that the person is qualified the fact that they are attractive is only a plus. I think the study you a mentioning is done with people that do not know the qualifications of the person they are viewing.
Re:I only got that job because I’m a girl
by glaak on Thursday September 27, 2012 @09:15PM
(#4583833)
True, it is done with people whose qualifications are unknown. However, I would find it very hard to believe that the bias against attractive women in a "masculine" field would be removed as soon as you knew the qualifications. Diminished a bit? Sure. But removed? Unlikely. Your initial assumptions will give you a lens through which you view someone's accomplishments.