Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by capo on Thursday September 27, 2012 @07:53PM
(#4583552)
Did Microsoft commission the study?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by justinschuh on Thursday September 27, 2012 @11:25PM
(#4584166)
It's hard to say. Microsoft paid directly for these "studies" in the past, and eventually people started ignoring them. So, now NSS simply doesn't disclose who pays for them.
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by barista on Thursday September 27, 2012 @08:00PM
(#4583571)
Must be. Because anything Microsoft does better especially in the areas of security must be flawed or propaganda </sarcasm>
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by krichman on Thursday September 27, 2012 @11:07PM
(#4584114)
Yes, that's correct, because most of us subscribe to Bayesianism.
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by Mythbusters on Thursday September 27, 2012 @08:23PM
(#4583676)
This HN. What did you expect?
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by mtgx on Thursday September 27, 2012 @10:18PM
(#4584005)
Well I remember when Chrome's security was broken for the first and only time, by a research firm. And guess who paid for that to happen? Microsoft.
So let me repeat that. Microsoft paid a company to break Chrome's security.
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by Torrents on Friday September 28, 2012 @11:26AM
(#4585998)
First and only known time?
Re:IE9 is better at blocking malware than Chrome, Safari, an...
by capo on Thursday September 27, 2012 @08:46PM
(#4583753)
It's a legitimate question; same actor released MSFT sponsored studies before: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/08/micros...