News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Possession of porn featuring strangling to become a crime... by GaryBluto on Monday November 03, 2025 @10:20PM (#45807136)
We even count domestic violence against men under the umbrella of "violence against women and girls" - men don't matter here.

It's unsurprising. GB has an unholy trinity of excuses for authoritarian laws:

1. "Think of the women and girls!"

2. "Think of the children!"

3. "This is a sacrifice we have to make to stop terrorism!" (which has taken a backseat to the first two)

Re:Possession of porn featuring strangling to become a crime... by goobatrooba on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @01:37AM (#45808012)
Just reacting to your first sentence: as a man I find it understandable that the protective laws are focused on protecting women and children as it's a simple fact of our reality that the vast majority of violent crime is committed by men, and that women and children have less physical ability to defend themselves. Yes I also want men protected (though that means mostly again from other men) but as a societal aim the women and children part clearly is a higher priority and need.
Re:Possession of porn featuring strangling to become a crime... by mock-possum on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @01:43AM (#45808046)
> We even count domestic violence against men under the umbrella of "violence against women and girls"

How is that possible, they’re categorically opposite?

Re:Possession of porn featuring strangling to become a crime... by GaryBluto on Friday November 07, 2025 @12:10AM (#45843701)