Re:Possession of porn featuring strangling to become a crime...
by goobatrooba on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @01:37AM
(#45808012)
Just reacting to your first sentence: as a man I find it understandable that the protective laws are focused on protecting women and children as it's a simple fact of our reality that the vast majority of violent crime is committed by men, and that women and children have less physical ability to defend themselves. Yes I also want men protected (though that means mostly again from other men) but as a societal aim the women and children part clearly is a higher priority and need.
Re:Possession of porn featuring strangling to become a crime...
by mock-possum on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @01:43AM
(#45808046)
> We even count domestic violence against men under the umbrella of "violence against women and girls"
How is that possible, they’re categorically opposite?
It's unsurprising. GB has an unholy trinity of excuses for authoritarian laws:
1. "Think of the women and girls!"
2. "Think of the children!"
3. "This is a sacrifice we have to make to stop terrorism!" (which has taken a backseat to the first two)