Re:"Why don't you use dependent types?"
by zozbot234 on Monday November 03, 2025 @07:34AM
(#45798379)
There are some theories like HoTT where it's convenient to let the same terms act as proofs while still having computational content and sometimes a distinct identity ("proof relevance"). For example a "proof" of isomorphism that might be used to transfer results and constructions across structures, where isomorphisms can be meaningfully distinct. Of course you do retain a significant subset of purely logical arguments where no computational content is ever involved and "identity" becomes irrelevant again.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.