News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite phone hacking. Parent comment

Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by IncreasePosts on Friday October 31, 2025 @05:46PM (#45777064)
Use that and you'll get charged with destruction of evidence
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by falleng0d on Friday October 31, 2025 @06:09PM (#45777233)
if you're relying on such feature, you'll probably serve less time being charged with destruction of evidence...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by ifh-hn on Friday October 31, 2025 @07:04PM (#45777687)
How would they know? Genuine question, I don't run GOS.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by aussieguy1234 on Friday October 31, 2025 @10:00PM (#45778668)
If the Duress PIN is an obvious one, it may be one of the first ones your adversaries try. Like 1111 for example. So you may not even have to tell them the Duress PIN for them to attempt it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by ThePowerOfFuet on Saturday November 01, 2025 @03:14AM (#45779793)
They'll have to prove it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by matheusmoreira on Saturday November 01, 2025 @12:40PM (#45783081)
Surely that's better than being charged with whatever crime they're trying to pin on you?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite ... by aftbit on Saturday November 01, 2025 @03:33PM (#45784589)
It depends, often the cover up is worse than the crime. See: Enron, Watergate, Trevor Jacob
[ Parent | on HN ]