Re:Scientists can't define consciousness, yet we think AI wi...
by shahbaby on Friday October 31, 2025 @03:56PM
(#45776039)
Agreed but it's even more fundamental than that.
We don't even have a universally accepted definition of intelligence.
The only universally agreed on artifact of intelligence that we have is the human brain. And we still don't have a conceptual model of how it works like we do with DNA replication.
We make break throughs in AI which get better at mimicry but then our society incentivizes selling out that mimicry for immediate profit rather than continuing to dig deeper.
I believe that there exists an element of human intelligence that AI will never be able to mimic due to limitations of silicon vs biological hardware.
We don't even have a universally accepted definition of intelligence.
The only universally agreed on artifact of intelligence that we have is the human brain. And we still don't have a conceptual model of how it works like we do with DNA replication.
We make break throughs in AI which get better at mimicry but then our society incentivizes selling out that mimicry for immediate profit rather than continuing to dig deeper.
I believe that there exists an element of human intelligence that AI will never be able to mimic due to limitations of silicon vs biological hardware.