News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker. Parent comment

Re:Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker by freedomben on Friday October 31, 2025 @12:26PM (#45773859)
Not pulling the "citation needed" thing at all, genuinely curious (from anyone who might know), is that 1/3 number accurate? Is there data published on it anywhere? That feels like monumental news :-D
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker by mdhb on Friday October 31, 2025 @12:30PM (#45773897)
https://flutter.dev/multi-platform/ios

It’s actually 28% I just checked but it’s front and centre there if you scroll down.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker by freedomben on Friday October 31, 2025 @01:49PM (#45774722)
many thanks!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker by techpression on Friday October 31, 2025 @05:33PM (#45776943)
28% of ”free new apps”, whatever that means, measured by someone who’s not Apple (so lacking the actual numbers).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker by mdhb on Saturday November 01, 2025 @02:51AM (#45779713)
Don’t get mad about it but a lot of people want to work with Flutter because they think is better for any number of reasons. The data is what it is.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Roadmap for Improving the Type Checker by techpression on Saturday November 01, 2025 @04:34AM (#45780108)
There are plenty of contradicting data, like the job market for Flutter being close to nil, if it was any relevant 30% of the App Store you would throw a rock and hit five Flutter developers.

And nobody’s mad.

[ Parent | on HN ]