News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by vonmoltke on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @10:31AM (#4575818)
I used to work in a quasi-academic development and production environment (DOD S&T[1]), and I heard that excuse quite a bit. Usually it was because someone had a pet idea that would be threatened or was too afraid of the risk of moving from the established development line.

[1] http://www.acq.osd.mil/chieftechnologist/index.html

There are no comments on this comment yet.