News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005).

Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by hollerith on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @08:47AM (#4575282)
OP describes Dijkstra's “Goto Statement Considered Harmful” as a paper whereas in reality it was a letter to the editor.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by cema on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @09:48AM (#4575559)
Well, I have not heard of such letters being rejected. Not read, maybe...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by msellout on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @01:04PM (#4576678)
That's the joke.
[ Parent | on HN ]