Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by vntok on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @11:02AM
(#45733766)
No. When you're thinking about questions like these, it is useful to remember that multiple (probably dozens) professional A-grade lawyers have been paid considerable sums of actual money, by both sides, to think about possible loopholes and fix them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by yahoozoo on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @05:13PM
(#45739283)
What would you consider valid methods of generating $100 billion? Enough Max/Pro subscribers?
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by vntok on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @02:55AM
(#45743479)
No. "Pro" subscriptions have nothing to do with AGI, my pet GPS tracker sells those.
We're talking about things that would make AGI recognizable as AGI, in the "I know it when I see it" sense.
So things we think about when the word AGI comes up: AI-driven commercial entity selling AI-designed services or products, AI-driven portfolio manager trading AI-selected stocks, AI-made movie going at the boxoffice, AI-made videogame selling loads, AI-won tournament prizes at computationally difficult games that the AI somehow autonomously chose to take part in, etc.
Most probably a combination of these and more.