News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by CamperBob2 on Friday October 24, 2025 @04:58PM (#45699005)
The card-shuffling machine is an obvious vulnerability.

But I'm provisionally calling BS on the "X-ray table." Based on (admittedly limited) experience with X-ray imaging, I don't believe that X-rays can read ink on playing cards. It would have to be a backscatter machine, which is even less discriminatory than a transmissive machine. Would need to see some evidence that this is possible.

If nothing else, the sheer size and bulk of such a machine renders the concept incredible. If I could build something like that, I wouldn't use it to cheat at cards, I'd sell it to the TSA!

Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by sigmar on Friday October 24, 2025 @09:17PM (#45700647)
Couldn't the cards have x-ray opaque ink (like with bismuth trioxide)?
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by CamperBob2 on Saturday October 25, 2025 @01:41AM (#45701578)
That could be a good point, I suppose. Iron-based ink could have a similar effect. I'll have to see if there's a deck of cards around here to X-ray.
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by BertoldVdb on Saturday October 25, 2025 @08:15AM (#45703296)
We tried this long ago at a university, the cards we had were entirely invisible to the x-ray.

I think the 'x-ray' table in the article works with IR cameras and illuminators under the table, and tablecloth that is slightly IR transparent.