> Well you realize it’s not a good look to post a citation and then immediately say the article is wrong

I did not say that the article is wrong, don't misquote me. You are also still failing to understand what the crucial difference is:

An iPhone was vulnerable to the pin-hijack, because of its limited security options - a security aware user was as vulnerable as an amateur.

An Android phone was only vulnerable if it was NOT properly secured.

So 100% of iPhone users were vulnerable, while Androids were only vulnerable if misconfigured.

So I was and I am still 100% correct, but you simply decided to nitpick that one sentence of mine that was prone to being nitpicked without bothering to understand what the significant difference between the systems were.

>But Apple implemented features to block that over a year ago.

Yes they did, after a lot of time and pressure. And if you read my comment again, you can see that I have already stated that they have implemented it. So what's the point of you telling me something that I have already mentioned several times?