Re:AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time
by kenjackson on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:13PM
(#45671358)
I get what your saying. But you are now asking for a level of intelligence and critical thinking that I honestly believe is higher than the average person. I think its absolutely doable, but I also feel like we shouldn't make it sound like the current behavior is abhorrent or somehow indicative of a failure in the technology.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time
by exe34 on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:23PM
(#45671503)
It's actually great from my point of view - it means we're edging our way into limited superintelligence.
Re:AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time
by Paracompact on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @08:13PM
(#45676755)
The bar for an industry should be the good-faith effort of the average industry professional, not the unconscionably minimal efforts of the average grifter trying to farm content.
These grifters simply were not attracted to these gigs in these quantities prior to AI, but now the market incentives have changed. Should we "blame" the technology for its abuse? I think AI is incredible, but market endorsement is different from intellectual admiration.