Re:Google demonstrates 'verifiable quantum advantage' with t...
by kantbtrue on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @11:52AM
(#45671020)
“13,000× faster” sounds huge, but I wonder what it’s being compared to. Quantum speedups are always tricky to measure
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google demonstrates 'verifiable quantum advantage' with t...
by jonathanstrange on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @11:55AM
(#45671059)
The article states: “...13,000 times faster on Willow than the best classical algorithm on one of the world’s fastest supercomputers...”
I agree it's not very precise without knowing which of the world's fastest supercomputers they're talking about, but there was no need to leave out this tidbit.
Re:Google demonstrates 'verifiable quantum advantage' with t...
by jasonthorsness on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:01PM
(#45671153)
The paper talks only about the Frontier supercomputer which is #2 on Top500. But I think it was an analysis rather than them actually running it.
Re:Google demonstrates 'verifiable quantum advantage' with t...
by jonathanstrange on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:04PM
(#45671211)
I was being sarcastic because 13,000 times faster is 4 orders of magnitude faster so it doesn't matter to which supercomputer it is compared.
Re:Google demonstrates 'verifiable quantum advantage' with t...
by nicce on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @04:25PM
(#45674702)
I don’t understand how these papers get accepted
Re:Google demonstrates 'verifiable quantum advantage' with t...
by cannonpalms on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @05:41PM
(#45675516)
The field is nascent. The bar is not static.