Re:Why Web-based development might not be the best choice
by babul on Thursday January 29, 2009 @12:39PM
(#456733)
GMail seems pretty fast to me, often faster than Outlook on my desktop which is synced to it.
Re:Why Web-based development might not be the best choice
by gsmaverick on Thursday January 29, 2009 @01:25PM
(#456831)
What browser are you using? That usually is most of the problem. Chrome chews through even the toughest javascript-based apps, including gmail, greader, facebook. It's way faster to load a web page than to open an application on my own machine.
Re:Why Web-based development might not be the best choice
by quoderat on Thursday January 29, 2009 @02:36PM
(#456970)
I use Firefox 3.0.5 on Linux.
I have 10,000RPM drives in RAID 0, so my computer is always faster to open a local app than to open a webpage.
Re:Why Web-based development might not be the best choice
by arockwell on Thursday January 29, 2009 @02:46PM
(#456989)
When I put ubuntu on my machine at home firefox 3 seemed substantially slower than it did on windows. I'm not sure if FF3 is crappy on iinux or if there was something about my install that was screwed up.
Re:Why Web-based development might not be the best choice
by boucher on Thursday January 29, 2009 @03:54PM
(#457099)
Firefox has some serious issues on Linux. It's admirable that they make a browser for Linux, but they do seem to let a lot more fall through the cracks than on other platforms.
For example, I've seen several websites that crash Linux in Firefox -- not good. The rendering in general is also not as good as win/mac, esp. with respect to transparency.
If I have a choice, I'll stick with desktop applications forever.
Sure, they're the right solution sometimes. But that doesn't mean I want to use them if I can help it.