Re:3x performance for 1/4 of the price by migrating from AWS...
by mike_hearn on Friday October 17, 2025 @01:11PM
(#45619181)
Why would it be abuse? Serving e.g. map tiles on a busy site can get up to tens of thousands of qps, I'd have thought serving that from S3 would have made sense if it weren't so expensive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:3x performance for 1/4 of the price by migrating from AWS...
by Esophagus4 on Friday October 17, 2025 @01:24PM
(#45619328)
I don’t know much about map tiles… but could that be done more effectively through a CDN or cache, and then have S3 behind it?
Then the CDN takes the beating. So this still sounds like S3 abuse to me.
But I leave room for being wrong here.
Edit: presumably if your site is big enough to serve 50k RPS it’s big enough for a cache?