Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just turn it off?"

Re:Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just tu... by virajk_31 on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @01:15AM (#45588307)

I think your post is fundamentally wrong. See, you are comparing AI responses with the written code, which may not be the fair comparison. I see it as, better you could compare code generated by AI vs the code written by an engineer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just tu... by schoen on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @01:18AM (#45588326)

The original author seems to view the AI application as itself a software application which has desired or undesired, and predictable or unpredictable, behaviors. That doesn't seem like an invalid thing to talk about merely because there are other software-related conversations we can have about AIs (or other code-quality-related conversations).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just tu... by emoII on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @01:27AM (#45588364)

AI responses and code generated by AI are literally the same thing

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just tu... by rbits on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @02:40AM (#45588828)

I'm confused by this comment. That's a completely different discussion.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just tu... by beyarkay on Thursday October 16, 2025 @02:53PM (#45609252)

I think you misunderstood my post? I'm comparing AI as a system vs written code as a system. Both systems can have flaws, but the way in which they fail is different. The danger comes when non-technical people try to apply intuitions about software failures to AI, because those intuitions are false when applied to AI.

[ Parent | on HN ]