After the AI boom: what might we be left with?

Re:After the AI boom: what might we be left with? by elorant on Sunday October 12, 2025 @04:10PM (#45561449)

Speech to text and vice versa exists for over a decade. Where's the life altering application from that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:After the AI boom: what might we be left with? by dcminter on Sunday October 12, 2025 @04:24PM (#45561575)

> this is not an intellectually honest claim

Don't do that, it's not cool.

> Take [...] a step further, and imagine the systems in 2035

How about imagining AI slop multiplied by 10 years. How bad is this going to get?

It's cool that you're excited, but you need a bit more than enthusiasm to make the case.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After the AI boom: what might we be left with? by KPGv2 on Sunday October 12, 2025 @04:42PM (#45561711)

> Speech to text and vice versa exists for over a decade.

Indeed. I was using speech to text three decades ago. Dragon Naturally Speaking was released in the 90s.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After the AI boom: what might we be left with? by lxgr on Sunday October 12, 2025 @06:33PM (#45562651)

Then you hopefully remember how “natural” it actually was.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After the AI boom: what might we be left with? by imtringued on Monday October 13, 2025 @06:40AM (#45566890)

The old voice bank for the redhead with drills had more soul.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After the AI boom: what might we be left with? by dragonsky67 on Sunday October 12, 2025 @07:25PM (#45563008)

tell that to the medical typing pool that no longer exists.

[ Parent | on HN ]