News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anthropic's Prompt Engineering Tutorial by ineedasername on Sunday October 12, 2025 @11:52AM (#45559109)
It’s not engineering if you throw anything together without much understanding of the why of things.

But if you understand the model architecture, training process, inference process, computational linguistics, applied linguistics in the areas of semantics, syntax, and more— and apply that knowledge to prompt creation… this application of knowledge from systemic fields of inquiry is the definition of engineering.

Black box spaghetti-hits-wall prompt creation? Sure, not so much.

Re:Anthropic's Prompt Engineering Tutorial by Den_VR on Sunday October 12, 2025 @12:00PM (#45559181)
Part of the problem is the “physics” of prompting changes with the models. At the prompt level, is it Even Possible to engineer when the laws of the universe aren’t even stable.

Engineering of the model architecture, sure. You can mathematically model it.

Prompts? Perhaps never possible.

Re:Anthropic's Prompt Engineering Tutorial by ineedasername on Sunday October 12, 2025 @12:12PM (#45559280)
It changes with any different flavor of a technology in any field of engineering, at least at the level of abstraction that you’re choosing to engage with the problem. Otherwise, this is just machine learning. It yields to the same conceptual approaches in quality control that require fundamental understanding of the underlying fields of study as any area of implementing technology—pretty much the definition of engineering.