Re:Rating 26 years of Java changes
by throwaway7783 on Saturday October 11, 2025 @09:20PM
(#45554271)
Whole point of spring is so you don't have to write your own libraries. Batteries included and all.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
@alex_smart hand rolls it all :)
Re:Rating 26 years of Java changes
by alex_smart on Sunday October 12, 2025 @02:16AM
(#45555721)
What if I told you - you can use a batteries-included framework, and still write your own libraries specifically only for things you want your own version of and want to share across projects?
The problem isn't that I don't know how to use a batteries included framework. The problem is that you guys don't know there is even an option to reuse your code by writing libraries.
Re:Rating 26 years of Java changes
by throwaway7783 on Sunday October 12, 2025 @11:18AM
(#45558805)
Why are you assuming you cannot write your own library and use it with Spring? It's not an either/or, just like most frameworks are. You are framing it as if there is only one way to do it in spring.
Please do not project things like "you guys don't even know..". I'm one of "you guys" , and have built production code in a variety of languages and frameworks. So this "you guys" knows exactly what he/she is talking about.
Re:Rating 26 years of Java changes
by alex_smart on Sunday October 12, 2025 @12:11PM
(#45559269)
> Why are you assuming you cannot write your own library and use it with Spring?
I am not. I am literally saying the exact opposite.
Re:Rating 26 years of Java changes
by throwaway7783 on Sunday October 12, 2025 @12:47PM
(#45559609)
Okay, that's fair. I don't even know anymore what point you are trying to make.
Re:Rating 26 years of Java changes
by alex_smart on Sunday October 12, 2025 @02:47PM
(#45560671)
I was making exactly the point that you can use your own libraries along with a batteries included framework like Spring Boot.
I don't even understand what the source of confusion is. I literally said exactly the same thing in the comment you first you replied to.