News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why LLMs cannot reach GenAI, but why it looked like they could.

Re:Why LLMs cannot reach GenAI, but why it looked like they ... by CarbonBasedUnit on Friday October 10, 2025 @09:31PM (#45545740)
From the article: "If I ask you to think through a problem you don’t think in symbols, numbers, or any other representation. You think in words, and therefore your ability to think relies on your ability to deploy words. "

Author hasn't done his homework. The belief thoughts = words has been well-debunked. The first hit from a lazy Google search is a Scientific American article all about it, helpfully titled 'You Don't Need Words to Think".

https://archive.ph/KjJ1R

Or, if you like scientific papers better, see "Language and thought are not the same thing: evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients"

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4874898/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why LLMs cannot reach GenAI, but why it looked like they ... by MakeAJiraTicket on Saturday October 11, 2025 @03:36PM (#45552022)
The author explicitly states that there are other types of thought, this is about structured reasoning.
[ Parent | on HN ]