News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:QA-use-MCP: MCP for E2E testing by agrnet on Friday October 10, 2025 @08:40PM (#45545367)
At the end of the day, is the LLM not just calling Playwright APIs? I’d rather have access to the final set of Playwright API steps that the LLM executed to accomplish a goal, rather than just hoping the LLM will choose the same actions again the second time i run it
Re:QA-use-MCP: MCP for E2E testing by tarasyarema on Saturday October 11, 2025 @06:20AM (#45547974)
We use PW for the interaction with the browser, but really how we represent what to do is in a custom format (could be executed in other frameworks too). So the PW we could generate would be a subset, where the more interesting parts (custom functions) are not really implemented in PW.

Also part of our format is specially finding deterministic way of running steps, with automatic healing when failed. And we also build the whole system in a way that is self-hostable, so in the cases you mention you could be able to have control over what is run and where.