Shake: Every Program Can Be a Clojure Function

Re:Shake: Every Program Can Be a Clojure Function by cemerick on Friday September 21, 2012 @11:12AM (#4554071)

use does accept an :as option:

    => (use '[clojure.set :as set])
    => set/intersection
    #<set$intersection clojure.set$intersection@58ca40be>

Prior to the addition of :refer to require, this was often paired with an :only (...) in order to alias a namespace as well as refer in some limited set of vars if desired, all in one declaration.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shake: Every Program Can Be a Clojure Function by jcromartie on Friday September 21, 2012 @11:54AM (#4554253)

Huh, I checked the docs before I commented. It is indistinguishable from require :as, thought, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shake: Every Program Can Be a Clojure Function by Tuna-Fish on Friday September 21, 2012 @02:07PM (#4554896)

As far as I know. Honestly, by use/require/refer-fu is not very strong, I always just use the ns macro.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Shake: Every Program Can Be a Clojure Function by cemerick on Friday September 21, 2012 @02:42PM (#4555096)

Yes, the :as option is the same whether you use it with require or use.

[ Parent | on HN ]