Previously submitted (not by me), but removed due to the usual flagging of all such content. Used actual title so not afowl of HN rules.

It’s not the title that’s the problem. HN readers flag these submissions because they feel they violate, either in letter or spirit, this HN guideline:

“Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.”

A lot of discussion on HN is ideological in nature, it’s just that the context is often Vue or React, or if PHP is good now, or how does SPA:s work in some browsers, or should desktop apps using Electron exist…

Humanitarian/ethics contexted articles being flagged means that HN curiosity is being trampled on in a certain manner, doesn’t it?

It’s HN readers who do the flagging.

I don’t sense any reluctance, or lack of interest in humanitarian or ethical articles, but rather the idea that Israel v Palestine is the core issue of the century.

True I suppose. But shouldn’t that be an even greater reason not to flag them? Issues of such importance is quite the opposite of regular bikeshedding.

IMO there's a massive difference between genuine curiosity and discussion over topics which have an outsized impact on domestic and global politics and actual polemics and 'ideological battle'.

FWIW I am not disagreeing, I do genuinely believe this is why people flag posts.