Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by yabones on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @10:56AM
(#45516913)
Absolutely agree. I'm a huge fan of co-op type ownership structures for this reason. They might not be moonshots or unicorns, but they always have longevity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by jacquesm on Thursday October 09, 2025 @04:16AM
(#45524943)
Mondragon Corporation. Have a look, fascinating.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by itsoktocry on Thursday October 09, 2025 @08:35AM
(#45526745)
>They might not be moonshots or unicorns, but they always have longevity.
We're going to need a fact-check on this. I'll bet the failure rate of co-ops is well beyond those of standard business structures.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by jacquesm on Thursday October 09, 2025 @08:47AM
(#45526909)
No, it's actually true, they are quite stable. What they lack though is outliers in terms of success. They tend to be quite conservative and as a consequence they are risk averse and tend to play it safe. For a high return you need a different appetite for risk. Of course the key to a different risk appetite is to be able to externalize the negatives of that risk but to be able to reap the rewards. Such asymmetric bets are at the root of most successful business empires, you'd never see them in a co-op.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by TheWookieDavid on Friday October 10, 2025 @04:11AM
(#45536446)
And you'd lose that bet. Co-ops have a survival rate way higher than those standard business structures.
Not marginally higher, a lot higher.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by itsoktocry on Thursday October 23, 2025 @12:47PM
(#45684039)
Where's the data?