Re:Banning controversy reveals Bluesky's decentralized aspir...
by andrewmcwatters on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @04:46PM
(#45508641)
Do you mean "misandry?"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Banning controversy reveals Bluesky's decentralized aspir...
by chimeracoder on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @04:52PM
(#45508707)
> Do you mean "misandry?"
No, OP is being transphobic and referring to trans women as men:
> Note that the "banning controversy" is that they're not banning enough people for having entirely mainstream political opinions, and mostly targets journalists. Or let's be more specific: mostly targets people who don't think that men can identify into being victims of misogyny.
Re:Banning controversy reveals Bluesky's decentralized aspir...
by andrewmcwatters on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @05:01PM
(#45508821)
Oh, I see.
Re:Banning controversy reveals Bluesky's decentralized aspir...
by AlexandrB on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @04:57PM
(#45508772)
While I can't read OP's mind, there is a problem with bad actors abusing pro-trans policies to benefit themselves. One of the most outrageous examples is the literal Nazi[1] who started identifying as female after being sentenced. Some gatekeeping is required here.