Should I choose Ada, SPARK, or Rust over C/C++? (2024)

Re:Should I choose Ada, SPARK, or Rust over C/C++? (2024) by graealex on Monday October 06, 2025 @03:16PM (#45495142)

As a more general rant - people who have maybe used 5% of the feature set of C++ come along and explain why language X is superior because it has feature Y and Z.

News flash, C++ has every conceivable feature, it's the reason why it is so unwieldy. But you can even plug in a fucking GC if you so desire. Let alone stuff like basic meta programming.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should I choose Ada, SPARK, or Rust over C/C++? (2024) by rpnx on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @12:59PM (#45505664)

GC was removed from the C++ standard in C++23 because all the compilers were like "hell no" and it was an optional feature so they could get away with not adding it. So this optional feature never actually existed and they removed it in later standards.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should I choose Ada, SPARK, or Rust over C/C++? (2024) by bluGill on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @04:51PM (#45508693)

There are ways to do GC without language support. They are harder, but have been around in various forms for decades. They have never caught on though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Should I choose Ada, SPARK, or Rust over C/C++? (2024) by pebal on Tuesday October 07, 2025 @05:52PM (#45509379)

The C++ standard has never included a garbage collector. It only provided mechanisms intended to facilitate the implementation of a GC, but they were useless.

[ Parent | on HN ]