News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by machina_ex_deus on Thursday October 02, 2025 @06:34PM (#45456418)
Nethanyahu didn't vote for Hamas, the Palestinians did, and they did it while the party in power in Israel was kadima, which just gave the Palestinians gaza literally for free.

Shortly after the election Hamas murdered the Fatah in Gaza and those elections were the last time the Palestinians had a say over who controls Gaza.

Nethanyahu only after the 7th of October decided that letting hamas rule Gaza is unacceptable, and this decision was only made after the terrible cost.

There Palestinians simply preferred hamas and terrorism over the PLO and relative peace in the one historical vote they were given. The situation might've changed since then. Making deals of two state solution when that second state could turn into another hamas state overnight would be an even bigger mistake.

The Palestinians can't barely make peace with themselves, between Fatah and hamas and agree to resolve their political conflicts in peace rather than armed conflict. When that's the case you can hardly blame Israel that they can't make peace. They need to commit to non violence between themselves before it's possible to commit to non violence with their enemies.

There's also a generation of Palestinians who's never even voted in Palestinian elections because there weren't elections in a decade.

Re: by lern_too_spel on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:24PM (#45456782)
> There Palestinians simply preferred hamas and terrorism over the PLO.... They need to commit to non violence between themselves before it's possible to commit to non violence with their enemies.

Hamas won 44% of the vote and then, as you noted, they murdered their political opposition. For this, everybody in Gaza should suffer both under a terrorist group running their lives and Israel bombing them?

Re: by machina_ex_deus on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:52PM (#45457011)
Hamas cannot be allowed to continue to exist after 7th of October. The cost of getting rid of hamas is this war and the casualties it takes from both sides. This isn't punishment for voting to hamas, it's necessary war to eliminate hamas. Necessary because so long as hamas exists, there will be more 7th of October massacres. Only 30% of Germans voted for Hitler yet it took tens of millions of casualties to get rid of him. Should everyone in Germany suffer because of Hitler? That's wrong question because there was no other option than to get rid of Hitler, and there is no other option than to get rid of hamas.

I only wish that the Palestinians would view hamas the same way Germans view Hitler. Imagine if instead Germans cried about how the allies split their land instead of taking responsibility for allowing Hitler to rise.

Re: by wredcoll on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:57PM (#45457053)
> That's wrong question because there was no other option than to get rid of Hitler, and there is no other option than to get rid of hamas.

I feel like there might, in fact, be other ways to do that.

Re: by ukblewis on Friday October 03, 2025 @03:40AM (#45460158)
How?
Re: by JumpCrisscross on Friday October 03, 2025 @07:31AM (#45461665)
> How?

Here's the thing, we don't have to answer that to allow more food into Gaza. There is a credible argument to be made that flooding Gaza with food actually reduces Hamas's ability to recruit by devaluing something they offer their fighters.

Re: by wredcoll on Saturday October 04, 2025 @05:37PM (#45476936)
Improve the living conditions of the average person so they're more interested in watching the next football game instead of taking vengeance for their murdered father.
Re: by LightBug1 on Thursday October 02, 2025 @06:40PM (#45456455)
"for free" ...

You're quite literally showing your ass there.

And while I don't support Hamas at all (from my safe, comfortable chair in the West), I can understand why desperate people, whose land is increasingly stolen, whose rights are increasingly abused, and who cannot see their lives improve would turn (or be turned) to an organisation who would ultimately commit such abhorrent acts.

Re: by JumpCrisscross on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:08PM (#45456659)
> can understand why desperate people, whose land is increasingly stolen, whose rights are increasingly abused, and who cannot see their lives improve would turn (or be turned) to an organisation who would ultimately commit such abhorrent acts

I can't. It doesn't work and makes you the bad guy. Even if just temporarily, that's enough for the other side to exploit. It's always been enough for the other side to exploit. Terrorism has a terrible track record for a reason.

That said, I challenge the premise. Palestinians didn't vote for October 7th. They didn't vote to suspend elections. They voted to kick Fatah out.

[dead]
Re: by JumpCrisscross on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:47PM (#45456972)
Idk how to respond to someone who argues, against a wealth of evidence, that terrorism works.
Re: by kQq9oHeAz6wLLS on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:47PM (#45456970)
And your post helps the conversation how?
Re: by LightBug1 on Friday October 03, 2025 @05:40AM (#45460951)
I'm reiterating and underlining a point made two posts ago about perspective. You're welcome.
Re: by bamboozled on Thursday October 02, 2025 @06:57PM (#45456577)
I can understand why desperate people, whose land is increasingly stolen, whose rights are increasingly abused, and who cannot see their lives improve would turn (or be turned) to an organisation who would ultimately commit such abhorrent acts.

There are a lot of examples of really bad stuff happening to groups of people over the centuries, very few of them have resorted to October 7 levels of horror.

I'm not Jewish, but the soviets did some really horrific shit to our family, and we actually lost all our land, our whole livelihoods and strangely, no one in our family killed women or children over it. We never resulted to terrorism to deal with the issue. We did get our land back in the 90s though.

I can guarantee you that if the Palestinians / Hamas didn't do October 7, they would be in a much better position than they are now. 99% of people lost the ability to feel sympathy for them after that. Which is why Israel can basically make the plans. Most of the world just gave up.

Re: by LightBug1 on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:16PM (#45456714)
Comparison of two peoples occupation and suffering and response to it is quite unfair.

And you act as if Oct 7th is the be all and end all of the story of the Palestine/Israel. "Oct 7th levels of horror". I won't excuse Hamas for what they did, but worse levels of horror have been inflicted on the Palestinian people. It's odd you ignore those levels or are ignorant to them. Just saying.

And you say 99% of people lost the ability to feel sympathy. I'll dispute that because the sane among us don't blame civilians for the actions of a paramilitary organisation gone wild. But let's pretend you're right. Isn't it ironic then that the world has so strongly turned against Israel now? (at least in the UN and your average people).

I'll contend that Israel may have destroyed Gaza, but in so doing they have destroyed their reputation and brought ill and hatred to their people now for a generation.

I'll defend Jews always as many have stood side by side with those against what's happening in Israel. But Israel has made their lives harder. Israel's actions have now made it much, much easier for the crazy people among us to do crazy things (c.f. today's Manchester, UK synagogue terrorist attack).

Re: by kossTKR on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:16PM (#45456715)
The way you conflate upwards of 150.000 slaughtered civilians (numbers directly from Isreali military sources - who are being ethnically cleansed according to UN experts, with Hamas is sinister and beyond dark, especially when you also completely ignore 75 years of Israeli violence and occupation before october 7.

Yeah the over thirty thousand dead kids really shouldn't have "done" october 7, a response done by completely different people to decades of violence, it was so stupid of them.

This is vile and incredibly dehumanising if not straight up violently racist.

Re: by JumpCrisscross on Thursday October 02, 2025 @07:29PM (#45456810)
> 150.000 slaughtered civilians (numbers directly from Isreali military sources

Source? Even Hamas claims fewer than 70,000 [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Gaza_war

Re: by machina_ex_deus on Thursday October 02, 2025 @06:55PM (#45456555)
In all objective measures of life quality, gaza was better off occupied by Israel, both compared with before 67 (Israel's occupation made Gaza prosper relative to when it was controlled by Egypt), and compared with after hamas took over and forced Israel to isolate gaza increasingly in order to deal with the terrorism from Gaza.

The only thing gaza didn't have under Israeli occupation was democratic election. And guess what, they didn't have that after the occupation stopped either. They don't have it in most Arabic countries either.