Re:Anti-Aging Breakthrough: Stem Cells Reverse Signs of Agin...
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday October 02, 2025 @04:36PM
(#45455236)
> its the effect size
Which effect size do you find lacking?
Re:Anti-Aging Breakthrough: Stem Cells Reverse Signs of Agin...
by SubiculumCode on Thursday October 02, 2025 @04:37PM
(#45455255)
I was responding to the idea that listing a small sample size automatically means its shit science.
Re:Anti-Aging Breakthrough: Stem Cells Reverse Signs of Agin...
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday October 02, 2025 @04:40PM
(#45455281)
Oh, absolutely correct. Small study doesn't mean shit science. It just means there is plenty of room for randomness and hidden variables to create havoc on the way to a treatment.
In terms of replicatability, it is also not always the sample size, it is the effect size. Small samples do affect ability to generalize, but the point is that sample size isn't everything.