News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by gilgoomesh on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @10:17PM (#45433626)
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Any app compiled using LLVM 17 (2023) can use SME directly and any app that uses Apple's Accelerate framework automatically takes advantage of SME since iOS 18/macOS 15 last year.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by saagarjha on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @05:28AM (#45435875)
Most apps do not use Apple’s Accelerate framework.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by svantana on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @05:52AM (#45435989)
What do you base this on? I use it in all my products and I don't see why any performance-sensitive dev outfit wouldn't at least consider using it.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by saagarjha on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @05:58AM (#45436014)
Most dev outfits are not performance-sensitive
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by mpweiher on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @06:07AM (#45436066)
The the whole benchmark discussion becomes moot, doesn't it?
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by saagarjha on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @06:08AM (#45436069)
Benchmarking a processor for real-world usage is definitely something you can do.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by danielheath on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @07:03AM (#45436345)
Benchmarking a processor for "app written by someone who disregards performance" is something you can do, but it's a bit of a pointless exercise; no processor will ever keep up with developers ability to write slow code.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by tsimionescu on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @08:31AM (#45436902)
An important question people care about is "will my day to day computing improve with the new processor?".
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores by gilgoomesh on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @09:34AM (#45437548)
Of course. And these are CPU vector instructions, so the saying "The wider the SIMD, the narrower the audience" applies.

But ultimately with a benchmark like Geekbench, you're trusting them to pick a weighting. Geekbench 6 is not any different in that regard to Geekbench 5 – it's not going to directly reflect every app you run.

I was really just pointing out that the idea that "no" apps use SME is wrong and therefore including it does not invalidate anything – it very well could speed up your apps, depending on what you use.