Certainly, and that is the more pessimistic view that I have, that this is being developed with a view to introduce product sponsorships and advertisements.
I mainly am curious if anyone has the view that there is broader benefit to the development of this, after all, wasn't that the entire mission statement of OpenAI?
Quoting from their announcement on their site:
> OpenAI is a non-profit artificial intelligence research company. Our goal is to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.
This feels like something constrained by the need to generate a financial return, and not something primarily focused on understanding physics and world models, to be blunt.
Aren't they trying to go for-profit and escape that albatross around their neck of "must feasibly be doing social good?"
> I would have never guessed a social media app whose biggest feature is “it disappears within 24h!” (even though you can easily screenshot everything) would become as big as it became.
Or 'everything has to fit into 120 characters' (= Twitter). Or 'replies are designed to be maximally rage bait-y' (= Tumblr).
To be fair at least Twitter started with the SMS limitations, so it made sense to have the limitation in exchange for being able to update it with an SMS, when Whatsup was not so common.
Also, remember that it’s not about benefitting society as a whole, it’s about benefitting the investors. If the investors get rich at the cost of society, it’s a win for OpenAI.