It’s basically sifting through ore; 99% of the people who see it aren’t the target, it’s the 1% of viewers who are buyers or funders who you otherwise couldn’t directly advertise to. Same reason you see defense contractors putting up ads for weapons systems in the DC metro.
Re:How the AI bubble ate Y Combinator
by Zorbanator on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @11:52AM
(#45427089)
There is one on 101 that says "My boss really wants you to know Redis is an AI company". Blows my mind how that marketing team is still employed.
Re:How the AI bubble ate Y Combinator
by BobaFloutist on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @02:58PM
(#45429661)
> I assumed billboards were for mass consumer marketing.
My hunch is that billboards on I-80 through San Francisco are a vanity product. Their actual purpose isn't marketing, but to flatter the egos of the CEOs that own the service - they get to dominate the sky, the eyes, and the brains for thousands of tech commuters twice a day. The one thing I'm not sure about is whether or not the people paying for the billboards actually think that their sales are going to materially benefit, but I'm pretty sure the sellers are clear that they absolutely will not - and either way, I'm sure people see it as a mark of prestige to have an ad there.
I assumed billboards were for mass consumer marketing. What tiny percentage of the people on these highways are actually in a position to act on any B2B tech marketing? I don't understand the economic choice to pay for a billboard like that. The ones along the highway that make sense to me are for iPhones and such.